Consensus determines what happens around here so however you identify yourself, it makes no odds.
2.
In the context of this discussion, it makes no odds what some court in India says anyway because there are thousands of secondary sources available for the purposes of definition and, of course, it is " Wikipedia's " rules that count, not India's.
3.
First, let's take your first argument-- " it makes no odds what some court in India says anyway because there are thousands of secondary sources available for the purposes of definition . " Two issues here-it's not " some court in India . " It's the Supreme Court of India.
मोबाइल